How to prepare a blank for planetary sketching with a terminator or equator

fisherka@csolutions.net Rev. 9/24/2006

Go to: Collect ephemeris data | Quick draw a simple blank with Microsoft Windows Paint | Draw a detailed blank also using MS Office Picture Manager | Draw a detailed blank by hand Draw a Saturn blank | Draw a Sun blank with the equator | Generate tracing templates using the NASA/JPL Solar System Live Planetica | NASA/JPL Horizons Ephemeris Generator

Summary

This note discusses the procedure for drafting the position of a terminator on a blank for planetary sketching either using a common Microsoft Windows tool (MS-Paint) and a Microsoft Office tool (MS Picture Manager) and by hand. The sketch blanks approximate the outline of the body and terminator that will be seen in a direct view eyepiece of a telescope tracking on an equatorial mount and where a reticule is used to indicate the direction to the celestial north pole (NCP). The terminator is pre-drafted based on a target observing date and time from ephemeris data.

The hand-drawing method updpates a procedure after Sidgwick, J.B. 1971. Observational Astronomy for Amateurs. Dover. pp. 121-124. Sidgwick's method approximates the terminator using a circle created with a drafting compass and is limited to 85%-100% illuminated fractions.

An 85%-100% illuminated fraction is the general range of the illuminated fractions of Mars that is visible to Earth based observers. Because of their extreme distance, superior gas giants (Jupiter and Saturn) generally have nearly 100% illuminated fractions at all optically visible Earth orbital positions. Inferior planets Venus and Mercury and the Moon have illuminated fractions that range from 0%-100%.

The variation on Sidgwick's hand-drawing method used here yields sketch blanks in the illuminated fraction range of 0%-100% for use with inferior planets Mercury and Venus. It can also be applied to preparing sketch blanks for whole, half and quarter Moon image drawings. This method also has limited application to the Sun and Saturn. Although these solar system bodies do not display a terminator per se, part of the technique discussed here includes looking up and marking the apparent position of the north pole of the body. For the Sun and Saturn that apparent position can move more than 10° in a year.

With proficiency, it is estimated a blank can be prepared in less than 10 minutes. A few simple multiplication and division calculations are most difficult math used to draw the terminator. A simple sine is calculated for the equator.

Online application alternatives

The easiest method to generate blanks with a terminator is to use one of two online applications. The NASA/JPL Solar System Live Planetica will show a realistic view of a planet as seen from Earth, magnified several hundred times, for a configurable date and time. Set the NASA/JPL Planetica to view a planet from the Earth with an apparent field of view that takes up one-half the width of the screen. The resulting image can be printed and the outline of the planet and shadow traced. The United States Naval Observatory Astronomical Applications Department has an online application that displays the current view of the Moon with terminator and latitude lines. Choose the option for "Data Services" and then "What The Moon Looks Like Today". The lunar view is based on a geocentric position. There may be minor differences in the appearance of the Moon from your topocentric position. Jim Mosher's Lunar Terminator Visualization Tool (LTVT) is a good selenographic planetarium program that can be used for preparing lunar terminator blanks by tracing. Another is Chevalley's Virtual Moon Atlas (VMA). The USNO lunar application only projects an image for the current date and time. LTVT and VMA can be particularized for a specific date and time.


Figure 1 - NASA JPL Planetica of Venus - suitable for tracing a planetary blank Credit: NASA JPL

Figure 2 - USNO Moon Tonight Sample Rendering - suitable for tracing a Moon blank Credit: USNO

Figure 3 - NASA JPL Planetica of Saturn - suitable for tracing a planetary blank Credit: NASA JPL

A net search for software that prepares blanks was done but nothing was found. If you are aware of any shareware or freeware for this function, please let the above author know.

Procedure overview

Ephemeris data is gathered that is necessary to construct the drawing. The planetary disk is drawn on a celestial NSEW grid. A tic mark is added to the circle which indicates the direction of the planetary north pole. An east-west trending line indicating the apparent direction of the bright limb is added. The size of the dark limb is marked on the bright limb line. A north-south trending line perpendicular to the east-west trending bright limb line is drawn. Using a lookup table, the radius of a circle that intersects the greatest size of the dark limb and the two points where the planetary disk intersects the north-south line to the bright limb. The arc of the circle that crosses the planetary disk is marked - approximating the terminator. The blank is finalized by removing construction lines and single or double reversing the image using a copier, as needed, depending on the number of reflections in the telescope used.

Nomenclature for ephemeris use

To read an ephemeris you need a basic understanding of this terminology that astronomers use to describe the many permutations of the three-way orientation that the Earth can take with respect to a planet and the Sun.

Figure 4 shows the relationship between the Sun's illumination of a planet and the view that we see of it from Earth. The view above the planet is shown in the top half of Figure 4; the view of the planet from Earth in the bottom half of Figure 4. Key to the relationship between the two views is the phase angle or in the nomenclature used by the NASA/JPL Horizons Ephemeris Generator the Sun-Target-Observer angle, abbreviated "S-T-O". The S-T-O angle is arc b to d in Figure 4. The phase angle S-T-O includes a right-angle and arc b-c in Figure 4. Arc a-b is also a right-angle. Therefore, arc a-c equals arc b-d in Figure 4, which is arc a-c also is equal to the phase angle S-T-O.

The phase angle modeled in the top half of Figure 4 (arc a-c) is proportional to the x axis dimension of the illuminated bright-limb fraction and the dark limb fraction of the planet as seen from the Earth. Arc a-c in the top half of the drawing is proportional to the length of the line e-f in the bottom half of Figure 4. Line e-f in the bottom half of Figure 4 represents the percent of the dark limb of the planet as seen by Earth (when divided by the planet's apparent diameter D). The length of line e-f, which is usually measured in arcsecs, is called the defect of illumination in professional astronomical jargon. In Figure 4, it is denoted by the variable q. Conversely, arc c-d in the top half is proportional to line f-g in the bottom half and represents the illuminated or bright-limb fraction of the planet's disk as seen from Earth. The illuminated fraction (the length of line f-g) is denoted with the variable i in Figure 4.

The direction of the Sun in Figure 4 is indicated by two parameters. The first defines the direction of the Sun in x-y plane of the ecliptic and is indicated by the phase angle (S-T-O). Since the phase angle and illuminated fraction vary proportionally, the phase angle is also indicated by the illuminated fraction of the planet, or i, in the bottom half of Figure 4.


Figure 4 - Schematic overviewing problem - converting 3D reality to the 2D face-on disk seen in eyepiece after Schlosser (1991)

The relative direction to the Sun in the x-z axis of the ecliptic is indicated in the bottom half of Figure 4 by the position angle of the Sun on the disk of the planet as seen from the Earth. That position angle is arc NCP-e-g in the bottom half of Figure 4 and is also labeled angle pa_bl for "position angle of the bright limb". In this case Figure 4 is not a particularly informative schematic. It shows a planet with no inclination above or below ecliptic plane, so the Sun shines directly on the planet in the x-z plane of the ecliptic and has the uninteresting position angle of 270°. A planet below the ecliptic would have a position angle of the bright limb that is greater than 270°; a planet above the ecliptic would have a position angle of the bright limb that is less than 270°.

Another important component to representing the orientation of the planet is the relative tilt of its axis of rotation relative to the Earth. This value is indicated relative to the North Celestial Pole - that common frame of reference that you establish in your eyepiece by turning off the tracking mechanism on your equatorial mount and watching the direction of field drift. The relative position of a planet's north pole (labeled "npp" in Figure 4). In professional astronomer jargon, the relative position of a planet's north pole as seen in the eyepiece is indicated by the north planet position angle. The position angle of the north planet pole is labeled "pa_npp" in Figure 4. In Figure 4, the NPP could be located at any number of positions - it could even be obscured on the side of the planet facing away from the Earth - and it still would have the same position angle. You need a second characteristic - the distance between the planet's disk center as seen from the Earth to the planet's North Planetary Pole in order to locate it. This distance is known as the north pole angular distance, is usually given in arcsecs and is labeled h in the bottom half of Figure 4. Where the value is positive, the NPP is on the side of the planet facing Earth; if negative, the NPP is on the side facing away from the Earth. You can also estimate this distance and the NPP's position angle using an eyepiece reticule.

For the purpose of drawing a planetary blank, the significance of the mark indicating the position angle of the north planetary pole is twofold. First, the pole probably is not located at the tick mark made on the circumference of the blank; it is probably located elsewhere along the position angle line. Second, the position angle of the NPP gives an indication of the axis of rotation of the planet at the eyepiece.

As noted above, in Figure 4 arc b-d (the phase angle) equals arc a-c and arc a-c and line e-f (the dark fraction) are proportional, as are line f-g (the illuminated fraction). The illuminated fraction (the phase) and the phase angle can be related mathematically with a series of equations that are detailed in the Math Appendix. That you understand how these equations work is not necessary to draw a blank planetary sketch template with a terminator on it. However, to read an ephemeris you need a basic understanding of this terminology that astronomers' use to describe the relative orientation of the Earth to a planet and to `the Sun.

Normal ranges by which these apparent orientation characteristics of the planets change over the year, as seen from Earth, are summarized as follows:

Table 1 - Approximately normal annual ranges of characteristics describing the apparent positions of the major planets and the Moon
Body & CharacteristicSun____Mercury___Venus___Moon_____Mars_____JupiterSaturn
Illuminated% n/a 0% to 100%0% to 100%0% to 100%86% to 100%99%-100%99%-100%
Position angle of bright limbn/a0° to 360°0° to 360°65° to 107°
233° to 279°
65.5° to 169°
246° to 290°
63.5° to 126.8°
239.5° to 294°
73° to 114°
281.5° to 298.8°
Position angle of north pole+-26°+28.6° to -4.1°+-22.8°+-21.9°+-38.6°3.9° to 18.9°-6.5°

Source: MICA 2.0; NASA/JPL Horizons

Step-by-step procedure

Table of radii for drawing the terminator

Table 5 shows values for y - the radius of a circle used to approximate an elliptical terminator - using Sidgwick's method and using an alternative sagitta method. This author was unable to replicate Sidgwick's method to find y, which is related to the formula of an ellipsis. Curve fitting indicates Sidgwick's values are approximately y=x^-1.5. Because it was apparent that Sidgwick's y values did not replicate the terminator at illuminated fractions near 50%, an alternative sagitta method was developed. Sidgwick's method is probably more accurate for illuminated fractions between 85%-90%, but his y values fail to draw accurate curves below about 75% illuminated fraction. The relative y values yielded by both approximations are shown in the following two figures. The sketcher is left to choose which best approximates the terminator for their specific application.


Figure 22 - y values by Sidgwick and sagitta methods 85% to 100%

Figure 23 - y values by Sidgwick and sagitta methods 50% to 100%
Table 5 - Radii for drawing the terminator based on phase (illuminated fraction%)
Illuminated % Illuminated %* y sagitta method y Sidgwick
100% 0% 1.000 1.000
99% 1% 1.000 1.015
98% 2% 1.001 1.030
97% 3% 1.002 1.050
96% 4% 1.003 1.065
95%**** 5% 1.006 1.080
94% 6% 1.008 1.100
93% 7% 1.011 1.115
92% 8% 1.015 1.130
91% 9% 1.020 1.150
90% 10% 1.025 1.170
89% 11% 1.031 1.190
88% 12% 1.038 1.215
87% 13% 1.046 1.240
86% 14% 1.054 1.265
85% 15% 1.064 1.300
84% 16% 1.075 **
83% 17% 1.088 1.334
82% 18% 1.101 1.360
81% 19% 1.116 1.386
80% 20% 1.133 1.413
79% 21% 1.152 1.441
78% 22% 1.173 1.470
77% 23% 1.196 1.500
76% 24% 1.222 1.531
75% 25% 1.250 1.563
74% 26% 1.282 1.596
73% 27% 1.317 1.630
72% 28% 1.356 1.665
71% 29% 1.400 1.702
70% 30% 1.450 1.740
69% 31% 1.506 1.780
68% 32% 1.569 1.821
67% 33% 1.641 1.863
66% 34% 1.723 1.907
65% 35% 1.817 1.953
64% 36% 1.926 2.001
63% 37% 2.053
62% 38% 2.203
61% 39% 2.383
60% 40% 2.600
59% 41% 2.868
58% 42% 3.205
57% 43% 3.641
56% 44% 4.227
55% 45% 5.050
54% 46% 6.290
53% 47% 8.363
52% 48% 12.520
51% 49% 25.010
50% 50% ***

Notes:
* - For illuminated fractions less than 50%, the table reflects and r' and y are drawn in the opposite direction.
** - Undefined for 50% illuminated fraction. At this illuminated fraction, the terminator is a straight line.
*** - Sidgwick's table only runs to 85% illuminated fraction - the expected range for Mars. Sidgwick's model is extended here to 65% illuminated fraction. Below 65% Sidgwick's method results in visually inaccurate terminators. The choice of which y factor to use at various levels of illuminated fraction is left to the sketcher.
**** - Sidgwick notes that below 95% illuminated fraction, the defect of illumination is usually not visually detectable and the blank should be drawn as an 100% illuminated (or dark) circle. This is the usual case for Jupiter.

How the sagitta method y-factor was derived

If the terminator construction problem shown in Figure 24 is rotated on its side, as shown in Figure 25, it becomes analogous to the problem of the sagitta measurement used for grinding a lens. In its rotated orientation, Figure 25, asks the question: What radius point f will draw a circle that passes through points c, i and c'? This is the same as the sagitta problem shown in Figure 26: If the chord of the lens is known and the depth (the sagitta) of the grind is known, what is the focal radius of the lens? Lens grinders use the sagitta measurement equation to grind nearly spherical lens blanks to the required focal length. Then minor strokes are used to make the spherical blank into a parabolic shape.


Figure 24 - Adding terminator construction points

Figure 25 - Rotating the terminator construction drawing

Figure 26 - The sagitta lens grinding problem

A variation of the sagitta equation for finding the focal radius during lens grinding is:

R=((D^2/4)+(Z^2))/(2*Z) {Eq. 1}

This is the equation that was used to generate the sagitta method y values in lookup Table 5.

Supplemental constructions

Drawing the Saturn blank

The working example is Saturn at October 20, 2006 10:00 UTC, using a sample data file from the NASA JPL Ephemeris Generator.

Because drafting techniques have been discussed in depth in prior examples, only brief instructions are provided in this example.

Materials assumed are MS-Paint, MS-Picture Manager, an MS-Office component, or any other drawing product that will allow you to rotate an image by a flexible number of degrees, and drafting data from the worked example ephemeris sample data file.

The key to constructing a Saturn blank using MS-Paint is understanding how MS-Paint draws ellipses. As noted above, the ellipsis tool in MS-Paint works by drawing the ellipsis that would be subscribed inside a square or rectangle. If the lengths of the major and minor axes of the required ellipsis are known, a square or rectangle can be constructed with sides equal to the major and minor axes's lengths. Registering the MS-Paint ellipsis tool on the corners of the constructed rectangle draws the desired ellipsis.

Drawing the Sun blank with the an oriented solar equator

The working example is the Sun on August 17, 2006 16:32 UTC, using a sample data file from the NASA JPL Ephemeris Generator.

Because drafting techniques have been discussed in depth in prior examples, only brief instructions are provided in this example.

This method to draw the equator is generic and can be used to add an equator line to your planetary sketch blanks.

Materials assumed are MS-Paint, MS-Picture Manager, an MS-Office component, or any other drawing product that will allow you to rotate an image by a flexible number of degrees, and drafting data from the worked example ephemeris sample data file.

The key to constructing a Sun blank with the equator correctly oriented extends the methods that you study for drawing a Saturn blank. MS-Paint's feature is used to draw an ellipsis equal to the obs-Earth latitude of the Sun at the time of observation. The solar sub-Earth latitude represented angle of tilt relative to the Earth based observering and the Sun.

As noted above, the ellipsis tool in MS-Paint works by drawing the ellipsis that would be subscribed inside a square or rectangle. If the lengths of the major and minor axes of the required ellipsis are known, a square or rectangle can be constructed with sides equal to the major and minor axes's lengths. Registering the MS-Paint ellipsis tool on the corners of the constructed rectangle draws the desired ellipsis that represents the equator.